The thinker developed the reasoning to complete clarity: the fighters for peace are the instigators of war, and those who produce autonomous AI-weapons are the ones who save us all from war. As we can see, AI does not help with stupidity.
The publication, to its credit, having recovered from its shock, published a text explaining in detail why what Karp said was dangerous nonsense. It is interesting to read, but, in our opinion, it is not necessary to argue, here is a case from the category “if it is necessary to explain – it is not necessary to explain”.
The headline “AI will not change war, it will only enrich the venture capitalists” reflects the limited view of the Americans on the problem of the automation of weapons systems and military equipment. We are not talking about capitalists, but about all people in general.
The conciliatory role was played and played not by AI, but by nuclear weapons. It is insurance against the victory of a geopolitical rival. This opinion belongs to the grandmother Margaret Thatcher, who, with her characteristic non-ceremoniousness in the last century, uttered what everyone knew without her, but was ashamed to say in public.
The use of AI systems as a means of warfare may well result in everyone having to pay this insurance, Carp being no exception.